Health &
Wellness Centres
Primary Health
Centre
Health & Wellness Centres are envisaged to provide a
comprehensive set of 12 services:
1.
Comprehensive
Maternal Health care services to be provided in those sites equipped to
services as “deliverypoint”.
2.
Comprehensive
neonatal and infant health careservices.
3. Comprehensive childhood and adolescent health
careservices
4. Comprehensive contraceptiveservices.
5. Comprehensive reproductive healthservices.
6. Comprehensive management of communicablediseases.
7.
Screeningand Comprehensivemanagementof non communicable
diseases.
8. Basic ophthalmic careservices
9. Basic ENT careservice
10. Screening and basic management of mental
healthailments.
11. Basic dental healthcare.
12. Basic geriatric health careservices.
ExistingStaffpattern MPHA(F) +MPHA(M)
HWC MLP : Midlevel Provider
Mid Level Provider (B.Sc. Nursing), to lead the Primary Health Care Team
at Subcentre MPHA (F) and (M)) and ASHAs
Ø MLHP would be responsible for ---
Ø Implementation of National Health Programmes
Ø Administration and management at Health and Wellness
Centers
Ø Provision of preventive, promotive and curative care
Ø Identification of danger signs and referral after
pre-referral stabilization
Ø Ensuring quality protocols are adhered to— including
implementationof Biomedical waste disposal and Infection Control guidelines.
Ø Provision of on the job mentioning to health workers
Ø Ensuringmaintenanceof inventory
of drugs, consumables, diagnostic and otherequipment
Ø Ensuring maintenance of records, and undertaking
monthly reviews of key indicators and provide feedback to the team
Ø Participation in monthly outreach and community level
meetings including engaging with representatives of Local Government
institutions/VHSNC
Any other job assigned by the Medical Officer of the PHC.
Institutionalizing
Performance Linked Payments (PLP) for Mid- Level Health Providers (MLHP)
Background: The Operational Guidelines for Ayushman
Bharat: Comprehensive Primary Health Care through Health and Wellness Centres
identify Performance Linked Payments as a strategy to improve motivation
levels, strengthen quality of services, enhance accountability for population
health outcomes and serve as a mechanism to identify performance and skill
gaps, at the Health and Wellness Centers at sub center level.The PLP are
provided for the Mid-Level Health Providers who willplay a key role in enabling
continuum of care.
This
guidance note is expected to enable the states to roll out Performance Linked
Payments for the primary care team at the HWC-SHC - A Mid-Level Health Provider
(Team leader), in the catchment population of the HWC-SHC.
These
payments are to be made on a monthly basis. Individual performance will be
assessed on the basis of data obtained from existing information systems.
However, states also have the flexibility to undertake independent monitoring,
to validate the information systems.
This could be done through partnerships with research organizations,
NGOs, State Health System Resource Centres and medical colleges or through
training the existing staff at district and block level to undertake
population- linked surveys to monitor progress on outcomes on a periodic basis.
The key
features and suggested indicators to guide performance linked paymentmechanism at
HWC-SHC is explained below-
1.
Level of Incentive Distribution: Sub-Centre-Health and Wellness Centers
2.
HWC-SHC - Mid-Level Health Provider as per the population of the
HWC-service area.
3.
Periodicity: Every Month
4.
Indicators for performance measurement and source of verification:The performance
will be assessed on indicators that will be amix of service utilization and
coverage of population for essential services.
(Table 1).
Key criteria
for selection of indicators is that they cover essential activities related to
the first seven service packages of CPHC that have been rolled out. Thus, outpatient services for acute simple
illnesses, provision of ANC, Immunization, services, screening and management
for NCDs and TB, and management of Vector borne diseases have been included. In
addition, other public health and management functions of HWC-SHC teams such as
community level meetings for health promotion and prevention, and monthly
meetings at HWC-SHCs have also been included.
The selected
indicators are those that are reported in the RCH portal, CPHC-NCD Application,
and Nikshay. Monthly performance will be assessed on a set of 15 indicators.
That have been specified in Table 1. Additional indicators if required may be
included by each State/UT linked on their specific context.For example states
having a high burden of vector borne diseases may include indicators pertaining
to same. However, the total amount linked with performance incentive for HWC
would remain the same. (Refer Point 5)
The list of
indicators will be updated periodically linked on the- experience gained from
the implementation of performance linked payments, progress on outcomes and
roll out of new service packages.
5.
Distribution of Incentive Amount for each HWC- The monthly incentive could
follow the distribution listed below:
·
The
maximum amount of incentive for Rs 15,000/ MLHP/month as per the work
performance.
6.
Incentive Amount to be allocated for the indicators- For ease of implementation in the early
stages, all indicators are weighted equally, and the MLHP would receive Rs.
1000 per indicator, up to a maximum of Rs. 15,000.
7.
Service Delivery Output for incentive payment- The service delivery
outputs as included in Table 1 have been graded at two levels of achievement:
75% and 100% for 8 out 15 indicators. Performance linkedpayment that is to be
disbursed for each indicator will correspond the level of achievement.
8.
Illustration for Calculation of incentives-*
|
|
Assessment Indicator |
Definition
|
Source of Verification/ Reporting |
Service Delivery Output to receive 75% of Incentive Payment |
Service Delivery Output to receive 100% of Incentive Payment |
Maximum incentive allocation for each personnel (Rs) at 75% achievement |
Maximum incentive allocation for each personnel (Rs) at 100%
achievement |
|
1 |
Number of
OPD cases in the month |
No. of OPD
cases including new and old cases |
NCD
application |
Min. 300
OP/Month |
400
OP/month |
MLHP=750 |
MLHP=1000 |
Based on standard assumption that
there fifteen indicators and monthly incentive allocated
9.
Key principles to assess performance:
Ø Indicators for performance measurement
of the primary care should be easily verifiable. The selection of indicators is
such that report for these indicators can be verified from the existing
information systems such as- RCH Portal/Registers, NCD Application of the CPHC
IT system, NIKSHAY, IDSP reports, meeting records submitted to PHC Medical
Officer.
Ø Ensuring that data is fed accurately
and regularly in the information system at each level is a collective and
individual responsibility of the HWC.
10. Process-
Ø The PHC Medical Officer under whose
jurisdiction the HWC-SHC is assigned or (any other suitable representative as
decided by the state) will be responsible for assessing the performance of the
HWC-SHC . He/ She will-
a.
Ensure
that MLHPs/MPWs are trained in using the CPHC IT system for online auto
compilation and transmission of performance data for HWC-SHC team. However, till the time such a system is in
place, MLHPs will use the data entered in the respective information system to
submit performance reports on service delivery outputs for the particular month
in a standard format developed by the state.
b.
Ensure
release of performance- linkedincentives within one month of submission of
performance report by MLHPs.
c.
Use
the performance monitoring mechanism to identify the areas of improvement for
the primary care team at the HWC-SHCand provide the necessary handholding and
support to improving the performance and overall service delivery at HWCs.
d.
Undertake
monthly visits to every HWC for field level monitoring visits and use these
visits to handhold and mentor HWC-SHC team.
11. Mode of Validation-
a.
Local-PHC-MO
will assess and validate the records submitted by MLHPs with the reports from
information systems- RCH Portal/Registers, NCD Application of the CPHC IT
system, NIKSHAY, IDSP reports, meeting records submitted for performance-
linked payment.
External-
(i) Existing mechanisms of 104 Call Centre etc. can also be used to validate
team performance data reported by MLHPs. (ii) States can also opt to assess
service use and satisfaction by random surveys of service users through
telephone surveys, (iii) States may also opt for nominating an independent
committee comprising of officials and civil society representative to validate
the quantity and quality of service delivered by HWCs. This committee can
evaluate the performance quarterly or bi annually to ensure that no conflict of
interest arises, during the process of performance- linked payment.
12. Ensuring timely payments
Though
external validation is essential to check fraudulent reporting; in any given
circumstance monthly payment of incentives to MLHPs and frontline functionaries
should not await call centre linked validations.
13. Possible Action for False reporting
by MLHPs:
MLHP as team
leader would be accountable for submitting performance reports of HWC-SHC team.
He/she should be given one warning if an instance of false reporting of
performance indicators is identified from the call-linkedvalidation of
performance reports. Any repeat of
falsification could result in deducting the amount from their salaries, and a
third instance could lead to termination of service contracts of MLHPs if
continuous false reporting is observed despite warning.
Table 1
Suggestive List of Indicators to Assess Monthly Performance of HWC-SHC for Service Utilization
|
|
Assessment
Indicator |
Definition |
Source of
Verification/ Reporting |
Service
Delivery Output to receive 75% of Incentive Payment |
Service
Delivery Output to receive 100% of Incentive Payment |
|
1 |
Number of OPD cases in the month |
No. of OPD cases including new and
old cases |
NCD application |
Min. 300 OP/Month |
400 OP/month |
|
2 |
Proportion of estimated pregnancies
registered |
Numerator: Number of pregnant women
registered for ANC Denominator – Total no. of
estimated pregnancies |
RCH Portal/ Sub Centre register |
60% of the estimated pregnancies
registered |
80% of the estimated pregnancies
registered |
|
3 |
Proportion of Pregnant Women
registered who received ANC |
Numerator - No. of pregnant women
who received ANC services (as per schedule) in a month
|
RCH portal/Sub Centre RCH register |
80% of the pregnant women received
ANC as per schedule |
100% of the pregnant women received
ANC as per schedule |
|
4 |
Proportion of Children up to 2
years of age who received immunization |
Numerator - No. of children who
received immunization (as per schedule) in a month
|
RCH portal/Sub Centre RCH register |
90% of the children received
immunization as per schedule |
100% of the children received
immunization as per schedule |
|
5 |
Proportion of High- risk pregnant
women who received follow-up care |
Numerator - No. of high-risk
pregnant women who received follow up care (as per schedule) in a month
|
RCH portal/Sub Centre RCH register |
100% of high-risk pregnant women
who received follow up care |
|
|
6 |
Proportion of Newborns who received
HBNC visits |
Numerator - No.of newborns who
received visits (as per schedule) as per HBNC schedule
|
RCH portal/Sub Centre RCH register |
80% of newborn received HBNC visits
|
100% of newborn received HBNC
visits |
|
7. |
Proportion of above 30 years individuals
screened for Hypertension* |
Numerator - No. of individuals
screened for Hypertension Denominator-Total population above
30 years of age |
NCD application |
Cumulative monthly 8% increment(SCREENING)
of above 30 individuals screened for HTN and to be repeated every year. |
|
|
8. |
Proportion of above 30 years
individuals screened for Diabetes* |
Numerator - No. of individuals
screened for Diabetes Denominator-Total population above
30 years of age |
NCD application |
Cumulative monthly 8% increment (SCREENING)of
above 30 individuals screened for Diabetes and to be repeated every year |
|
|
9 |
Proportion of Patient of HTN on
treatment |
Numerator - No. of HTN patients who
received follow up care
|
NCD application |
30% of patients who received
treatment |
50% of patients who received
treatment |
|
10 |
Proportion of Patient of DM on
treatment |
Numerator - No. of DM patients who
received follow up care
|
NCD application |
30% of patients who received
treatment |
50% of patients who received
treatment |
|
11 |
Proportion of cases referred for TB
screening |
Numerator-Number of suspected TB
cases referred for diagnosis/ Denominator- Total number of patients attended
in OPD |
Nikshay/HWC records |
Minimum 3% cases identified from
OPD should have referred for screening of TB |
|
|
12 |
Notified TB patients who received
treatment as per protocols |
Numerator - No.of TB patients who
are on regular treatment as per protocol |
Nikshay/TB treatment card |
100% of patients on treatment |
|
|
13 |
VHND held against planned |
Numerator - No.of VHND attended Denominator - Total no.of VHND held |
Self- reported in
CPHC-NCDapplication |
MLHP should monitor at least two VHNDs in a
month for performance- linked incentive |
|
|
14 |
Village meetings (VHSNCs)/MASheld |
Numerator - No.of VHSNC / Village
meetings attended as per plan Denominator - Total no.of VHSNC/
Village meetings held |
MLHP should monitor at least two VHNSC
meeting in a month for performance- linked incentive |
||
|
15 |
Organized monthly meeting with
Primary Care Team at Sub centers HWCs to monitor the following- |
One meeting held at the SHC- HWC
and should be attended by MPWs and all ASHAs |
|||
Bridge Course undergone
by the MLHP
·
6 month course — byIGNOU
·
Course Outline —
·
Theory classes
and hands-on Practicum training atProgramme Study Centers and Health
Centers (District Hospitals,
CHCs, PHCs, Sub-centers, etc.) identified and accredited IGNOU.
·
In addition,
community visits would also be conducted for field- based assignments and
research projects.
|
Site |
Activities |
|
District Hospital & CHC |
Case management, Understand
Functionality, HR pattern, lab services, records & reports, M&E, etc. |
|
Orientation visit to Primary Health
Centre |
Case management of general medical
conditions, ambulatory, Infrastructure &equipment, functioning of PHCs |
|
Orientation Community visit to Sub
Centers and Community |
Antenatal, postnatal, camps,
management & referrals, Health education, observe VHNDs and functions of
ASHA in field. |
|
Visit to DPMU, BPMU, PRIs, centers
where the programs are being implemented |
Understanding the system of Health
planning & Management: Village Health Action Plan –Role of PRIs, VHSNCs,
Observation of activities undertaken under the National Health & Family
Welfare programs |
Mid level
health providers are posted in the sub-centers in the initial phase.
All the sub
centers except headquarters sub-centers will be converted into e-sub-centers by
March 2019.
The PHC
Medical Officer is overall incharge of MLHP and MLHP should report to Medical
Officer for any queries.

0 Comments